Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (2024)

Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (1)

Open Proposal

The following is an ongoing proposal. Please feel free to voice your opinion, but be sure to follow the rules.

How proposals work

    Concerns stage
  1. Someone brings up a topic for a proposal.
  2. The community discusses that topic.
  3. Voting stage
  4. The proposal is brought to a vote, taking into account any changes discussed by the community.
  5. The community votes.

You can use any of the following prior to your comments to show your opinion.

{{Support}} • {{Neutral}} • {{Oppose}} • {{Change}} • {{Comment}} • {{Reply}} • {{Question}}
Neutral votes do not count in determining the outcome percentage.

Contents

  • 1 Instructions
  • 2 Proposal
    • 2.1 Exceptions
    • 2.2 Blocking the user
  • 3 Voting

Instructions[]

This page is the voting stage of this discussion: "Blocking policy (revision 10)."

With all concerns from the concern stage of this discussion having been resolved and taken into account, the proposal located in the "Proposal" section above has been created and moved to voting. To join the voting, you simply use buttons located in the "Voting" section of this page and fill the resulting page.

Have a happy voting!

Proposal[]

Jiunaughten is proposing the following:

There have been a couple of queries regarding some elements of the blocking policy lately. I am proposing some changes to the wording of the current policy, to remove ambiguity and ensure that the policy is applied consistently between the various administrators. The changes that I am proposing are below; new text is in bold, removed text is struck out:

If a user is violating any rule, administrators must resolve the problem and politely notify the user of their wrongdoing by giving one warning on their message wall.

If a user breaks two different rules, that counts as one warning for each rule. A user that breaks the same rule twice merits will receive a block.

If a warned user continues to break the same rule within twenty-four hours without acknowledging the warning, the an administrator should try to will contact that user again by replying to the original warning message.

If the warned user continues to break the same rule for twenty-four (24) hours after the administrator tried to contact them again after twenty-four (24) or more hours have passed since the original warning thread was posted, or any period of time after the user has acknowledged a message on their message wall, the user will be blocked for a maximum of fourteen (14) days.

Any user who continues to violate the rule for which they were blocked within seven days after their initial block ends will receive further penalties another block of greater duration, with the extent of the increase in block length depending on the rule(s) violated and the severity of the offense at the discretion of the administration. Users who continue to break a rule they were blocked for previously will not receive further warnings before another block is imposed.

Exceptions[]

Any user who commits offenses that are very serious to the point in at which they harm the wiki or threaten a user may be blocked immediately for any given amount of time at the discretion of the blocking administrator.

Any user who spams, vandalizes, harasses, or threatens a user or the wiki as a whole as their first contribution or interaction may will be blocked immediately without warning, for a duration of two (2) weeks. If they continue to violate such rules after their block, they shall be given an infinite block.

Users that misuse spelling and/or grammar, unintentionally use improper formatting, and/or make an accidental edit shall not be blocked.

Blocking the user[]

When an administrator blocks a user, they must use the {{Blocked}}​ template inform the user that they have been blocked via a message on their message wall to notify that they have been blocked. This allows the blocked user to know that they have been blocked and the reason, so that they can be linked to the policies to better understand our rules, as well as learn how to appeal a block.

Administrators must leave the user's message wall open in order for the blocked user to make an appeal case so that the user can informally enquire about the block, should they so wish.If a blocked user abuses their wall privileges by spamming, threatening, or harassing other users, before making an appeal case, they have forfeited their chance to make an appeal for the duration of the block and can will have their message wall privileges removed until the end of their block.

A bureaucrat may unblock the user if they deem it an unfair block. If any other bureaucrat is in disagreement, the bureaucrat disputing the block must start a block review.

These changes are not as substantial as they look, and mainly constitute an long-overdue update to policy wording in order to reflect current practice. I am not proposing any changes to the "block disputes" section of the policy. In particular, the reasoning for removing the text about appealing blocks on ESB message walls is so as not to contradict that section of the policy.

Please leave a concern if you see any issues with these changes. Jiunaughten (talk) 21:53, 20 May 2024 (UTC)

The voting stage will conclude no later than June 3, 2024 at 8:17 PM EDT (June 4, 2024 at 00:17 UTC). Anthony2306(WCLE)00:17, 28 May 2024 (UTC)

Voting[]

Choose your input: SupportNeutralOpposeComment

  • Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (2) Support - Anthony2306(WCLE)00:20, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (3) Support - BSpongeSM02(WCELA)00:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (4) Support - Clarification will definitely be helpful after being confused blocking a user recently. FireMatch(WCE)00:42, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (5) Support - Jfro8461 (talk) 01:07, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (6) Support - (WCELA) Sign Here!Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (8)01:21, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (9) Support - SpongeTron D(WCE)06:57, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (10) Support - Jiunaughten (talk) 07:38, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (11) Support - SPONGEBOBSUPERFANINFINITY (M·C·E·A·L·B)
  • Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (12) Support - The Hawk(WCE)Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (13)Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (14)Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (15)
  • Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (16) Support - PinkPugPrincess(WCLEA)Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (17)Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (18)Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (19)Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (20)Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (21)Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (22)21:29, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (23) Support - BookFandumb(M·B·C·E)Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (24)21:45, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (25) Support - LarryBoy fan (talk) 08:06, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (26) Support - 0fflinejoe(WCE)Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (27)Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (28)Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (29)10:15, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
Proposals/Blocking policy (revision 10)/voting (2024)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Aracelis Kilback

Last Updated:

Views: 5783

Rating: 4.3 / 5 (44 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Aracelis Kilback

Birthday: 1994-11-22

Address: Apt. 895 30151 Green Plain, Lake Mariela, RI 98141

Phone: +5992291857476

Job: Legal Officer

Hobby: LARPing, role-playing games, Slacklining, Reading, Inline skating, Brazilian jiu-jitsu, Dance

Introduction: My name is Aracelis Kilback, I am a nice, gentle, agreeable, joyous, attractive, combative, gifted person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.